RE: [Boost-users] Signals & Slots

From: Foster, Gareth (gareth.foster_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-18 04:15:04

Cheers Doug,

I was thinking more of a, "hey, what do you think to this lads" than an
outright "you should be using Boost heathens!"  :)   Sound advice nontheless
mate, I'll keep you posted.

Gaz

-----Original Message-----
From: boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]
[mailto:boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Doug Gregor
Sent: 17 November 2004 20:25
To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Signals & Slots

On Nov 17, 2004, at 11:34 AM, Foster, Gareth wrote:
> Thanks for the reply Doug, do you mind at all if I forward this to the 
> GTKmm
> mailing list?

Go ahead.

>  I would like to ask them what they think of your
> implementation. I hope to use GTKmm (which uses libsigc++ of course), 
> and I
> think boost is great, so I'd be interested to see if maybe the GTKmm 
> devs
> could be using boost more etc. I'm sure you get the idea, main thing 
> is, I
> don't want it to look like I am trying to start a slaging match (hence 
> me
> asking first) :)

I would suggest learning quite a bit about both libsigc++ and 
Boost.Signals before you try to suggest to anyone that they make such a 
switch, because it will surely require a significant amount of effort 
and may change the semantics of GTKmm considerably.

        Doug

_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users_at_[hidden]
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users