Re: [Boost-users] Signals & Slots

From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-18 14:02:25

On Nov 18, 2004, at 12:02 PM, Caleb Epstein wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:41:26 -0500, Doug Gregor 
> <dgregor_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Very simple explanation here: my comments were about libsigc++ 1.2.
>> I've glanced briefly at libstdc++ 2 and was pleasantly surprised. I'd
>> like to look into it further, but do not have the time now. I've been
>> saying for a while that the Signals interface is not ready for
>> standardization because we only had the one implementation (in Boost)
>> and that it was not solid enough for standardization. However, with
>> libstdc++ 2 adopting a similar interface, we might be able to converge
>> on a single, solid interface for Signals & Slots within the C++
>> Standard Library. Library Technical Report 2 is open for submissions,
>> and signals & slots have been on the wish list since the beginning...
>
> Do you mean "libsigc++ 2" for "libstdc++ 2"?

libsigc++ 2.

        Doug