Re: [Boost-users] Signals & Slots

From: Caleb Epstein (caleb.epstein_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-18 12:02:31

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:41:26 -0500, Doug Gregor <dgregor_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Very simple explanation here: my comments were about libsigc++ 1.2.
> I've glanced briefly at libstdc++ 2 and was pleasantly surprised. I'd
> like to look into it further, but do not have the time now. I've been
> saying for a while that the Signals interface is not ready for
> standardization because we only had the one implementation (in Boost)
> and that it was not solid enough for standardization. However, with
> libstdc++ 2 adopting a similar interface, we might be able to converge
> on a single, solid interface for Signals & Slots within the C++
> Standard Library. Library Technical Report 2 is open for submissions,
> and signals & slots have been on the wish list since the beginning...

Do you mean "libsigc++ 2" for "libstdc++ 2"?

-- 
Caleb Epstein
caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com