Re: [sigc] Re: [Boost-users] Signals & Slots

From: Edward Diener (eddielee_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-19 20:55:37

Carl Nygard wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 14:09, Doug Gregor wrote:
>> On Nov 18, 2004, at 1:10 PM, Murray Cumming wrote:
>
>> I'm not in a position to do this at the moment, although possibly in
>> the future. It would be *wonderful* if someone went off and studied
>> both libraries in-depth to make this comparison, especially if that
>> person was not intimately familiar with either library beforehand.
>>
>
> Available: http://www.3sinc.com/opensource/boost.bind-vs-sigc2.html
>
> Updates for code samples from Chris Vine and Jonathan Brandmeyer will
> be forthcoming.
>
> I could use some suggestions on how to incorporate common code into
> the code comparison tables.
>
> And of course, any other comments, flames, etc. will be welcome.  I'm
> only doing this as a service for keeping track of comments.  I'd like
> to see some of this stuff make it into the C++ standard library.

As of the upcoming release, the Boost signals library does make a guarantee
of the order of signals within a particular group. The order within a
particular group is FIFO.