Re: [sigc] Re: [Boost-users] Signals & Slots

From: Mauricio Gomes (mg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-22 07:54:38

> "Soon" (in a few years, once TR1 is implemented across the board) we'll
> hopefully be able to get 'bind' and 'function' by just including
> <functional>.

Hello Peter,

I am just following the discussion here.
Please forgive my ignorance but what is TR1 ?

Thanks,
Mauricio Gomes
Pensar Digital
phone: [phone]
mobile: [phone]
http://pensardigital.com

On Nov 20, 2004, at 10:26 AM, Peter Dimov wrote:
>
> About:
>
> [-ed I'd love this, as long as I didn't have to use all of Boost to 
> get it].
>
> in reference to Boost.Bind. You don't need all of Boost. boost::bind is
> reasonably self-contained. I see that a dependency on mpl::bool_ has 
> crept
> up in boost/ref.hpp, but Bind does not need it, so it's excisable 
> without
> much effort.
>
> "Soon" (in a few years, once TR1 is implemented across the board) we'll
> hopefully be able to get 'bind' and 'function' by just including
> <functional>. This will also help Boost.Signals a bit since I suspect 
> that
> nowadays most of the preprocessed code comes from boost::function.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>