Boost Users :
From: Foster, Gareth (gareth.foster_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-06 08:03:33
Interesting stuff, thanks all that replied.
I think was just trying to related the function type to the syntax seen in
other types, the fact is that the function type is a bit special I suppose,
so I should really just take it by itself.
I think I've seen all the possible uses for it thanks to the replies I've
had here anyway. It's always interesting to see syntax from the murkier
corners of the C++ repertoire :)
[mailto:boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of John Maddock
Sent: 06 January 2005 10:45
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Re: a question on boost::is_function
> Could I do ...
> int (int) * p_my_function_pointer;
> Or some other such madness? I'm reading MSDN about the indirection
> at the moment, maybe that will help to clear this up in my head. Can you
> recommend a page on "function types".
You can certainly do it via a typedef:
typedef int mysig(int);
mysig* p_my_function; // declares function pointer
mysig myproc; // declares a function called myproc with signature mysig.
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net