Re: [Boost-users] Re: boost::program options question. Implicit() doesn't seem to work

From: The Grumpiest Man You Know (mrgrumpyguts_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-10 00:42:46

On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:41:39 +0300, Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I think it's the library. But in any case, I plan to remove the 'implicit'
> flag in 1.33. Why do you want it? What about:
>

Really?  I thought that was quite useful for things like.  

$ foo --help
usage: foo [-sexy-options]
$ foo --help topic
The "topic" option crazumps the doobryferk.

Is there a better way than implicit for that?  Is implicit causing
some ugliness that warrants it's excise?

>   desc.add_options()
>      ("debug", bool_option(), "enable debugging")
> 
> ?
> - Volodya
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
> 

-- 
Blue Skies