[Boost-users] gcc stlport or libstd++ with boost?

From: will_at_[hidden]
Date: 2005-03-22 19:30:18

Friends:
     I am new to boost.  I was planning on using stlport for its
debugging.  However, I now realize that much of the info. I have read
on libstd++ is dated.  Using gcc 3.3 it seems like boost is better
suited to libstd++(based on reading regression tests, and mail
threads).  Are most who use gcc and a lot of boost using libstd++
over stlport(these days)?

thanks,
Will