[Boost-users] Re: Compilers compliance and boost.

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-20 00:24:30

Mauricio Gomes writes:
> According to these reports it seems there is not a single compiler
> able  to compile 100% of boost, is that right ?

Yes, it's a technically correct statement w.r.t. CVS-HEAD, but it's
more a reflection of the current state of our codebase than that of
the tested compilers' compliance.

>
> http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/cvs-head/user/summary.html
> http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/cvs-head/developer/summary_release.html
>
> What is the best compiler to use boost ? Or in a less subjective way,
> what is the compiler that pass most tests ?
>
> Although it is mentioned here
> (http://www.boost.org/status/compiler_status.html) otherwise the link
> to the "Compiler Status Summary" page is only showing reports on Linux
> and it is not mentioning the version (CVS-HEAD ?).
> The other reports (links above) show the results for several platforms
> but they seem to be only available for CVS-HEAD.
>
> Where can I find the reports for a specific version like 1.32 for
> example ?

See http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/1_32_0/developer/summary_release.html

HTH,
-- 
Aleksey Gurtovoy
MetaCommunications Engineering