Boost logo

Boost Users :

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-26 14:49:21


> I dont understand the need for the "Proposed Boost logging library".
> A perfectly good and flexible logging library exists in the form of
> log4cxx,
> which is much more flexible than the proposal, has a ton of tools,
> appenders, is compatible with log4j/log4net etc etc (for those of us
> who live in multiple worlds). log4cxx is going through a almost complete
> rewrite, but is still eminently usable. see
> http://logging.apache.org/log4cxx/

First statement from docs:

"Log4cxx is C++ port of Log4j."

Which tells me enough to be skeptical about your statements. I did not see
single Java -> C++ port that has even something to talk about.

Gennadiy


Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net