[Boost-users] Re: boost:bind versus bind1st

From: Jeff Flinn (TriumphSprint2000_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-06 07:09:55

"me22" <me22.ca_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:fa28b925050505202161aae165_at_mail.gmail.com...
> On 5/5/05, Shetty, Diwakar <Diwakar.Shetty_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> Will it be okay to say that the advantages of
>>    boost::bind over bind1st and bind2nd are
>>
>> 1) bind1st and bind2nd works with func obj only
>>
>> 2) boost::bind does not require func to have
>>        result_type and first_argument_type
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Diwakar
>>
>
> Possible Additions:
>
> 3) boost::bind works for functions with more than 2 parameters
>
> 4) boost::bind works transparently for member functions
>

5) boost::bind works transparently for member functions invoked
   through pointers and boost smart pointers.

Jeff Flinn