Re: [Boost-users] bind's bind vs lambda's bind

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-29 13:04:08

David Abrahams wrote:
> "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> If you are aiming at a real TR1 bind, you'll have to add (much) more
>> coverage anyway; boost::bind is too simple.
>
> Really!  Are you planning to remedy that?

I think that the current implementation of boost::bind does have its 
advantages. :-)