Re: [Boost-users] bind's bind vs lambda's bind

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-29 18:58:42

"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>
>>> If you are aiming at a real TR1 bind, you'll have to add (much) more
>>> coverage anyway; boost::bind is too simple.
>>
>> Really!  Are you planning to remedy that?
>
> I think that the current implementation of boost::bind does have its 
> advantages. :-) 

I'm sorry, that's a little too cryptic for me.

What advantages?

If Boost.Bind isn't going to be TR1 compliant, what will John
Maddock's Boost.TR1 use?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com