Boost logo

Boost Users :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-29 18:58:42

"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> If you are aiming at a real TR1 bind, you'll have to add (much) more
>>> coverage anyway; boost::bind is too simple.
>> Really! Are you planning to remedy that?
> I think that the current implementation of boost::bind does have its
> advantages. :-)

I'm sorry, that's a little too cryptic for me.

What advantages?

If Boost.Bind isn't going to be TR1 compliant, what will John
Maddock's Boost.TR1 use?

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at