Boost logo

Boost Users :

From: Simon Buchan (simon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-26 17:38:09


Howard Hinnant wrote:
> On Sep 26, 2005, at 10:29 AM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
>
>
>>On Sep 25, 2005, at 7:52 PM, Simon Buchan wrote:
>>
>>>Hmm, I think a lot of distributions of TR1 will, at first, be edited,
>>>copied, trimmed, out-of-date, versions of boost's implementations
>>>anyway,
>>
>>I'm not sure this is true; at least, it isn't for the 3
>>implementations of TR1 that I know are in development. All of them
>>were built (mostly) from scratch, although the authors did borrow
>>some ideas and test cases from the Boost implementations.
>
>
> <nod>
>
> CodeWarrior Pro 9 has:
>
> template <class Sig> class result_of
> template <class T> class reference_wrapper
> template <class T> reference_wrapper<T> ref(T& t)
> template <class T> reference_wrapper<const T> cref(const T& t)
> template <class Sig> class function
> template<class T> class shared_ptr
> template<class T> class weak_ptr
> template<class T> class enable_shared_from_this
> template <class T0, class T1, ... class T9> class tuple
>
> Pro 10 (beta) adds:
>
> bind
> array
> type_traits
>
> All built as Doug describes. This "native" implementation can take
> advantage of compiler functionality such as __declspec__ or __typeof__,
> and superior type traits support. And bind just kicks butt with rvalue
> reference capability turned on. ;-) Definitely not "copied, trimmed,
> out-of-date."
>
> -Howard
Ahh, sorry, I've only seen the temporary GCC, and an unofficial MSVC
(can't remember where) implementation. (Bows head)
Is CodeWarrior still going strong? I thought Apple dumped them or
something? (Off-Topic, don't need to reply)


Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net