[Boost-users] inconvenient for boost::thread::sleep

From: RocWood (rocwood_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-03 21:14:54

boost::thread::sleep, IMHO, it's too inconvenient.

I get these example code to sleep 1 second,
{
    boost::xtime xt;
    boost::xtime_get(&xt, boost::TIME_UTC);
    xt.sec += 1;    // change xt to next second
    boost::thread::sleep(xt);
}
and, only 1 line in another platform(origianl plaform or java)
{
    sleep(1000);
}

hmmm...
Too inconvenient, and, to make things worse, quite a heavy calling.

Is there any suggestion for me?
Thanks.