Re: [Boost-users] boost::sub_range vs boost::iterator_range

From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-08 23:00:34

At 16:18 2005-12-08, you wrote:
>Victor A. Wagner Jr. wrote:
>
> >>I've added the following overload
> >>
> >>
> >>         sub_range& operator=( sub_range r )
> >>         {
> >>             //
> >>             // argument passed by value to avoid
> >>             // const_iterator to iterator conversion
> >>             //
> >>             base::operator=( r );
> >>             return *this;
> >>         }
> >>
> >>and can now compile your program.
> >>
> >>I've also committed this to the main cvs.
> >
> >
> > yes, it compiles, and runs on vc7.1
> > it does NOT compile on vs8.0 (which is currently my default compiler)
>
>was there any difference in the compiler there? Is it still operator= in
>iterator_range that gets called?

yes, vs2005 has the vc8.0 compiler... I'll repost the program AND the errors...
http://www.noidea128.org/sourcefiles/15688~
that souce is already trying to call SNway_merge and shows 2 errors.

>-Thorsten
>
>_______________________________________________
>Boost-users mailing list
>Boost-users_at_[hidden]
>http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

Victor A. Wagner Jr.      http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"