|
Boost Users : |
From: Felipe Magno de Almeida (felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-15 09:34:38
On 1/14/06, MB <mb2act_at_[hidden]> wrote:
[snip]
>
> Here is the long story:
> http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2004/n1674.pdf
Offtopic: Maybe the problem doesnt lie on const/non-const member
functions? And the ugly syntax to choose the const when using a
non-const class?
Maybe this proposal shouldnt be more general? Not applying only to
iterator/const_iterator. IMO, if it was, it would probably have more
chance of acceptance.
>
> Regards,
> MB
> p-stade.sourceforge.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>
Best regards,
-- Felipe Magno de Almeida
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net