|
Boost Users : |
From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-25 15:00:23
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:u3bi7705a.fsf_at_boost-consulting.com...
> "Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> "David Abrahams" wrote
>>> "Andy Little" writes:
>>
>>> I wouldn't care much what you said, except for that you're doing this
>>> in a thread where impressionable "newbies" are reading, and I don't
>>> want them to misunderstand the library design or the implementation
>>> decisions and their costs/benefits.
>>
>> I can continue in private if you wish ?
>
> If you feel the need to continue to label the transform behavior as
> sloppy without justification, then that would be better. Otherwise,
> either explain how transform could be better or, please, just retract
> your remark about the behavior of transform for the record.
I retract the remark which referred to mpl::transform as sloppy. I offer my
sincere apologies to anyone who may have taken offense.
regards
Andy Little
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net