Re: [Boost-users] [mpl] newbie question

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-26 14:31:44

"Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]> writes:

> "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
> news:u3bi7705a.fsf_at_boost-consulting.com...
>> "Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>
>>> "David Abrahams" wrote
>>>> "Andy Little"  writes:
>>>
>>>> I wouldn't care much what you said, except for that you're doing this
>>>> in a thread where impressionable "newbies" are reading, and I don't
>>>> want them to misunderstand the library design or the implementation
>>>> decisions and their costs/benefits.
>>>
>>> I can continue in private if you wish ?
>>
>> If you feel the need to continue to label the transform behavior as
>> sloppy without justification, then that would be better.  Otherwise,
>> either explain how transform could be better or, please, just retract
>> your remark about the behavior of transform for the record.
>
> I retract the remark which referred to mpl::transform as sloppy. I offer my 
> sincere apologies to anyone who may have taken offense.

Thank you, that helps focus the discussion.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com