Re: [Boost-users] [Test] minimal test

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-14 23:19:42

"Robert Ramey" <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:e1ndd8$ebp$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
> I attempted to use the minimal verision of boost test. In order to do this 
> I replaced
> occurencs of
>
> #include <boost/test/exec_monitor.hpp>
> with
> #include <boost/test/minimal.hpp>

Is there any particular reasons why you want to do this? My general 
recommendation: unless there is a reason stick with UTF.

> This generates a few problems.
>
> a) In the tests which use the serialization DLL,  It seems that references 
> are being made to symbols in the library.  Here is the output
> from the link.  I can't figure out why this is.

I don't think you could do this. My guess is that you define BOOST_DYN_LINK 
that will cause dynamic version of execution monitor sumbols to be compiled. 
And minimal test facility isn't cut for that.

> b) At least a few "test tools" macros aren't present
> BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL and  BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE among themRobert Ramey

Actually 99% of them is absent. And only 3 are present.  But that was your 
choice, isn't it?

Gennadiy