Re: [Boost-users] [shmem] New bugfix version in Boost Vault andsandbox cvs

From: Jeff Flinn (TriumphSprint2000_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-08 08:38:06

Ion Gaztañaga wrote:
>> I think this is their intended purpose, but I don't like using them
>> that way.  It gets confusing and brevity isn't attained as you have
>> to qualify things.  Namespaces support a "let's just agree to
>> disagree" approach that isn't a resolution, but is the best that
>> can be done at times.  Do you think this shmem functionality should
>> be integrated with the std containers?
>
> Some STL implementations are close to achieve Shmem compatibility and
> it's not difficult to achieve if they use allocator::pointer typedefs
> in their implementation instead of raw pointers.

Have you submitted a proposal to the library working group?

Jeff