Boost logo

Boost Users :

From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-08 11:12:59

Jeff Flinn(e)k dio:
> Ion Gazta�aga wrote:
>>> I think this is their intended purpose, but I don't like using them
>>> that way. It gets confusing and brevity isn't attained as you have
>>> to qualify things. Namespaces support a "let's just agree to
>>> disagree" approach that isn't a resolution, but is the best that
>>> can be done at times. Do you think this shmem functionality should
>>> be integrated with the std containers?
>> Some STL implementations are close to achieve Shmem compatibility and
>> it's not difficult to achieve if they use allocator::pointer typedefs
>> in their implementation instead of raw pointers.
> Have you submitted a proposal to the library working group?

No, but it a good idea.


Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at