Re: [Boost-users] [shmem] New bugfix version in Boost Vault andsandbox cvs

From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-08 11:12:59

Jeff Flinn(e)k dio:
> Ion Gazta�aga wrote:
>>> I think this is their intended purpose, but I don't like using them
>>> that way.  It gets confusing and brevity isn't attained as you have
>>> to qualify things.  Namespaces support a "let's just agree to
>>> disagree" approach that isn't a resolution, but is the best that
>>> can be done at times.  Do you think this shmem functionality should
>>> be integrated with the std containers?
>> Some STL implementations are close to achieve Shmem compatibility and
>> it's not difficult to achieve if they use allocator::pointer typedefs
>> in their implementation instead of raw pointers.
> 
> Have you submitted a proposal to the library working group?

No, but it a good idea.

Ion