|
|
Boost Users : |
From: Steven E. Harris (seh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-15 11:43:07
David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:
> My proposal, which was first submitted in 2002, has never been given
> any serious consideration.
Well, at least N1912 throws you a bone:
,----
| N1691 may remain a preferable solution to N1893 because it does not
| break existing code.
`----
If there are fewer costs with your proposal, it's hard to see why the
author used "may" here. Picture the MadLibs version of this sentence:
__[noun]__ /may/ remain a preferable solution to __[noun]__ because
it does not __[egregious action clause]__.
-- Steven E. Harris
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net