|
Boost Users : |
From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-08-23 13:53:10
"Pierre-Jules Tremblay" <iamtrep_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:4590bfef0608230550s5de6f427j45d531fbe6090cbd_at_mail.gmail.com...
> Well.. in general, not that often, I suppose.
>
> In our augmented version of your test framework, I've implemented
> fairly sophisticated logic to catch memory leaks on a per-test-case
> basis.
Would you be interrested t oshare it with us if it's generic enough?
> In the results accounting, I need to know whether a test
> failed because of a memory leak or because it failed a predicate
> check.
>
> Come to think of it, perhaps this belongs more as an FAQ item for the
> documentation rather than a tool proper.
Ok.
> pj
>
> On 8/17/06, Gennadiy Rozental <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> "Pierre-Jules Tremblay" <iamtrep_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> news:4590bfef0608171408o5637d299s452bf55c19fbd6dd_at_mail.gmail.com...
>> >I am such an impatient lad, I answered my own question:
>> >
>> > #include <boost/test/results_collector.hpp>
>> >
>> > if ( boost::unit_test::results_collector.results(
>> > boost::unit_test::framework::current_test_case().p_id ).passed() )
>> > {
>> > // do something useful.
>> > }
>> >
>> > Is there a better way?
>>
>> Looks right. I would define a alias for boost::unit_test.
>>
>> > How about providing a tool wrapper for this feature?
>>
>> Why do you need this? How frequent do you think this would be requested?
>>
>> Gennadiy
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Boost-users mailing list
>> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
>> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>>
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net