Boost logo

Boost Users :

From: Stephen Turner (sturner_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-10 11:27:03


> -----Original Message-----
> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:12:18 -0700
> From: Jeff Garland <jeff_at_[hidden]>
>
> Yes, sorry I was off the net on holiday for an extended
> period :-) Finally getting caught up now...
>

Thanks!

> I would recommend that this be created as an alternative
> tz_database class --
> something like 'historic timezone database'. My experience
> is that must
> applications don't need the historic data and hence only
> really care about
> loading up the current set of rules.

I'm sure that's true for many users. But I also wonder how many users there
are who do care but haven't had a problem until now because they're in
countries where the rules haven't changed in recent years, so it's just
worked.

But let me put it the other way round. If a historical database were
available, why would anyone choose to still use the existing method?
Assuming the new method didn't impose a noticeable speed or memory
constraint, of course.

-- 
Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK   http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/
"The internet is a reflection of our society. If we do not like what we see,
 the problem is not to fix the mirror, we have to fix society." (Vint Cerf)
 

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net