Re: [Boost-users] [signals] connection::add_tracked() proposal

From: Gottlob Frege (gottlobfrege_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-21 14:08:59

On 2/21/07, Frank Mori Hess <frank.hess_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Yes, I suggested a member function on the connection because that allows
> you to add an arbitrary number of tracked objects to a connection.  If
> they are passed as parameters to connect, you are either limited to
> tracking a single object (or fixed number with default parameters), have
> to pass the objects in a container, or have to make connect a variadic
> function.
>
> - --
> Frank

Do you think having a slot that requires multiple objects to be
tracked is common?
Should we have both the single param guarantor (typical case?) plus
the ability to add additional things to track?

Tony