Re: [Boost-users] [signals] connection::add_tracked() proposal

From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-21 15:04:21

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 21 February 2007 14:08 pm, Gottlob Frege wrote:
>
> Do you think having a slot that requires multiple objects to be
> tracked is common?
> Should we have both the single param guarantor (typical case?) plus
> the ability to add additional things to track?

Well, we could just keep around boost::track() if connection::add_tracked() 
is considered too ugly for the common case.

- -- 
Frank
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF3KXG5vihyNWuA4URAvn9AJ4mDcNtfbyA1APEfP/NEku+zupXNwCfUKCl
rZR+mxuYY5gXQfi2tZSHeK8=
=q7St
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----