Boost logo

Boost Users :

From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-28 12:20:25


Currently I only have the HEAD and RC_1_34 on my system
and can't run a gcc test. I did build and compile and test
with vc 7.1 and found no problems.

Try serializing your test to xml archive. That will make
the details a lot more visible.

Sohail Somani wrote:
> I'm using 1.33.1. If I use serialization/shared_ptr_132.hpp, same
> issue. Does the test fail for you?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden] on behalf of Robert Ramey
> Sent: Wed 3/28/2007 1:15 AM
> To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re:
> [Boost-users][serialization]Assertion`new_cid==cid'failed-fails on
> gcc,works on msvc
>
> RE: [Boost-users] [serialization] Assertion`new_cid==cid'failed-fails
> on gcc, works on msvcHmm - I'm not sure which version of boost you're
> using.
>
> For boost version 1.32 one needs to use
>
> BOOST_SHARED_POINTER_EXPORT(T)
>
> This requirement was eliminated in 1.33 onward but I'm not sure which
> version you're using
>
> Robert Ramey
>
> "Sohail Somani" <s.somani_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:1C1EBEF8DBACDC439D038EA051674EC73EE10C_at_xbox.financialcad.com...
> Nope, same thing. Is there a way to enable some debug traces of the
> serialization? Inspection by debugging isn't helping much. What does
> the serialization library do differently for abstract classes? The
> part that is still confusing me is that I only have these issues when
> serializing shared_ptr. Raw pointers work just fine.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden] on behalf of Robert Ramey
> Sent: Tue 3/27/2007 10:28 PM
> To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [serialization]
> Assertion`new_cid==cid'failed-fails on gcc, works on msvc
>
> OK
>
> Try the following:
>
> //BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT(base);
>
> BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT(derived);
>
> #include <boost/serialization/shared_ptr.hpp>
>
> //BOOST_SERIALIZATION_SHARED_PTR(base);
>
> BOOST_SERIALIZATION_SHARED_PTR(derived);
>
> The base class shouldn't need exporting as it never
>
> directly instantiated.
>
>
> Robert Ramey
>
>
> Sohail Somani wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]
> >> [mailto:boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Robert
> >> Ramey Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 2:39 PM
> >> To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
> >> Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [serialization] Assertion `new_cid
> >> ==cid'failed-fails on gcc, works on msvc
> >>
> >> Note that serialize a poly morphic shared pointer requires a
> little
> >> bit of gymnastics. Check out the "test_shared_ptr" and the
> >> source of serialization/shared_ptr.hpp
> >
> > I think I've followed the documentation, but the attached test
> still
> > triggers an assertion when deserializing on gcc 3.2.2:
> >
> > $ ./build/stage/bin/test_serialize
> > Serialized form: 22 serialization::archive 3 0 1 2 7 derived 1 0
> > 0 1 0
> > 1 10 derived id
> > test_serialize: basic_iarchive.cpp:466: const
> > boost::archive::detail::basic_pointer_iserializer*
> >
> boost::archive::detail::basic_iarchive_impl::load_pointer(boost::archive
> >>> detail::basic_iarchive&, void*&, const
> > boost::archive::detail::basic_pointer_iserializer*, const
> > boost::archive::detail::basic_pointer_iserializer*(*)(const
> > boost::serialization::extended_type_info&)): Assertion `new_cid ==
> > cid' failed.
> > Aborted
> >
> > This assertion does not trigger occur on Visual C++ 7.1. Can you
> spot
> > if I'm doing something obviously silly?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>
>
>
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Boost-users mailing list
>> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
>> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users


Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net