Re: [Boost-users] [RFC] Preferred API for a CGI library proposal

From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-05 15:31:33

Darren Garvey wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> This may seem off-topic, but I assure you it isn't. ;)
> 
> This is an initial probe for ideas about an API for [any] upcoming CGI 
> library submission. I have my own ideas, but I don't think putting them 
> here would be particularly relevant. The reason I'm asking such an 
> open-ended question is that I'm assuming lots of people here will have 
> experience using CGI libraries (possibly in other languages, possibly 
> your own) and may have specific ideas about what should or shouldn't 
> move from them into a Boost.CGI library, if one were accepted.
> 
> Whether or not you see the point of a C++ CGI library, your comments on 
> APIs provided by other languages would still be very much appreciated!
> 

Hey Darren -

This might be a better topic for the developer list -- I suggest you post 
there.  Also, it would actually be a good idea to post some ideas about scope 
for people to comment on since that gives everyone a bit more discuss.

Jeff