|
Boost Users : |
From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-06 03:57:11
jp_at_[hidden] wrote:
> hi,
>
> i hate rewriting getopts, but avaliable implimentations are always
> horrible, so there i was. then i decided to use boost::program_options
> ....
>
> all i want to do is something like..:
>
>
> translate --seq1 10 --seq2 10 13 --filter *.cpp *.hpp *.h
>
> where seq1 and seq2 can take any number of numbers between 0 and 255
>
> anyway, if i use anything like
>
> desc.add_options
> ("seq1", po::value< std::vector<byte> >() -> multitoken() ->
> composing() -> notifier(seq1()), "byte sequence to find")
>
> it just returns all the tokens following the first option. is the library
> too stupid to stop eating tokens when it comes to another option? if so,
> what is its point?
I'm sorry for being rush, but unless you'll manage to ask questions in a polite
way, your questions are likely to be purely rhetorical.
- Volodya
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net