|
Boost Users : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-07-17 17:35:11
on Tue Jul 17 2007, "Robert Ramey" <ramey-AT-rrsd.com> wrote:
> Tell me what the change to the source code should be.
Robert,
Valgrind is very reliable (although it is possible for it to report
false positives about uninitialized data) and the OP's test case looks
simple enough to be considered minimal. If you can't find a problem
with it, can you at least be looking at your implementation of
reset_object_address to see if you can find a likely use of
uninitialized data without making the OP debug unfamiliar code?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net