Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-03 21:39:52

Next message: egoots: "Re: [Boost-users] [1.34.0][iostreams] regex filter seg faults when zero matches found"
Previous message: gast128: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost.Test Documentation"
In reply to: Anders Sundman: "Re: [Boost-users] WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN"
Next in thread: Anders Sundman: "Re: [Boost-users] WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN"
Reply: Anders Sundman: "Re: [Boost-users] WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN"

>> Would it be prudent to patch the Boost headers to only define
>> WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN if it is not already defined? If not, is there another
>> solution that I am overlooking.

Ok, I dropped WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN from Spirit. I discussed it with
Hartmut and neither of us know where that came from. Probably a
pre-boost artifact.

Regards,

-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net

Next message: egoots: "Re: [Boost-users] [1.34.0][iostreams] regex filter seg faults when zero matches found"
Previous message: gast128: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost.Test Documentation"
In reply to: Anders Sundman: "Re: [Boost-users] WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN"
Next in thread: Anders Sundman: "Re: [Boost-users] WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN"
Reply: Anders Sundman: "Re: [Boost-users] WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net