Re: [Boost-users] WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN

From: Anders Sundman (sundman.anders_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-05 06:09:43

Great! Thank you for your quick resolution of this problem. I hope the
remaining defines in other library headers also can be removed.

// Anders

On 8/4/07, Joel de Guzman <joel_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> Would it be prudent to patch the Boost headers to only define
> >> WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN if it is not already defined?  If not, is there another
> >> solution that I am overlooking.
>
> Ok, I dropped WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN from Spirit. I discussed it with
> Hartmut and neither of us know where that came from. Probably a
> pre-boost artifact.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Joel de Guzman
> http://www.boost-consulting.com
> http://spirit.sf.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>