|
Boost Users : |
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-16 11:36:08
Ovanes Markarian wrote:
> I now know that this is an invalid usage, after I know that 'smatch' is
> based on iterators. Since 'smatch' does not encover in the docs what
> internal structure it has, I did not conclude that it is based on
> iterators. And a string const& as param does not mean for me, that this
> string should be valid later on. May be I am wrong.
The docs are pretty explicit about smatch using iterators. See the
section "Results Invalidation" here:
> BTW: the trick with volatile does not work in MSVC 8.0 Express compiler.
> :( Would be great if the upcoming standard would provide a temporary
> checking facility ;)
Yes, I know. It's a compiler bug. FYI, the next standard *does* provide
a way to detect temporary objects. It's called "rvalue references".
> Many thanks for the great lib and your time!
My pleasure. Thanks for the feedback.
-- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net