Re: [Boost-users] [review] Fast track formal review of Forward library begins today

From: Ovanes Markarian (om_boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-03 11:27:33

Hello John!
Hello Tobias!

Is there any link to the docs, where I can view them online? I would like
first see the docs online before I decide to download/install the lib.

Many thanks,
Ovanes

On 12/3/07, John Torjo <john.groups_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The formal review of the Boost.Functional/Forward library, proposed by
> Tobias Schwinger, begins today :
>
> Boost.Functional/Forward provides decorator function objects to have an
> n-ary,
> generic function object accept both RValues and mutable LValues.
>
> An exponential number of overloads is needed with C98, so redundant
> solutions are highly undesirable.
> Functional/Forward is a reusable implementation asking to live in a
> central place in Boost.
>
> Download it from here:
>
>
> http://www.boost-consulting.com/vault/index.php?action=downloadfile&filename=forward.zip&directory=X-Files&
>
> http://www.boost-consulting.com/vault/index.php?&direction=0&order=&directory=X-Files
>
> The documentation is included in the .zip file, in the usual place:
> forward/libs/functional/forward/doc/html/index.html
>
> What to include in Review Comments
> ==================================
>
> Your comments may be brief or lengthy, but basically the Review Manager
> needs your evaluation of the library. If you identify problems along
> the way, please note if they are minor, serious, or showstoppers.
>
> Here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:
>
>      * What is your evaluation of the design?
>      * What is your evaluation of the implementation?
>      * What is your evaluation of the documentation?
>      * What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library?
>      * Did you try to use the library? With what compiler?
>        Did you have any problems?
>      * How much effort did you put into your evaluation?
>        A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study?
>      * Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?
>
> And finally, every review should answer this question:
>
>      * Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library?
>        Be sure to say this explicitly so that your other comments
>        don't obscure your overall opinion.
>
> We're looking forward to your evaluation of this Boost candidate!
>
> John Torjo
> - Review Manager -
>
>
>
> --
> http://John.Torjo.com -- C++ expert
> ... call me only if you want things done right
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>