Re: [Boost-users] [review] Fast track formal review of Forward library begins today

From: John Torjo (john.groups_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-04 09:23:54

Ovanes Markarian wrote:
> Hello John!
> Hello Tobias!
>
>
> Is there any link to the docs, where I can view them online? I would 
> like first see the docs online before I decide to download/install the 
> lib.
>
Hi Ovanes,

http://www.torjo.com/tobias/

Best,
John
>
> Many thanks,
> Ovanes
>
> On 12/3/07, *John Torjo* <john.groups_at_[hidden] 
> <mailto:john.groups_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     The formal review of the Boost.Functional/Forward library, proposed by
>     Tobias Schwinger, begins today :
>
>     Boost.Functional/Forward provides decorator function objects to
>     have an
>     n-ary,
>     generic function object accept both RValues and mutable LValues.
>
>     An exponential number of overloads is needed with C98, so redundant
>     solutions are highly undesirable.
>     Functional/Forward is a reusable implementation asking to live in a
>     central place in Boost.
>
>     Download it from here:
>
>     http://www.boost-consulting.com/vault/index.php?action=downloadfile&filename=forward.zip&directory=X-Files&
>     <http://www.boost-consulting.com/vault/index.php?action=downloadfile&filename=forward.zip&directory=X-Files&>
>     http://www.boost-consulting.com/vault/index.php?&direction=0&order=&directory=X-Files
>     <http://www.boost-consulting.com/vault/index.php?&direction=0&order=&directory=X-Files>
>
>     The documentation is included in the .zip file, in the usual place:
>     forward/libs/functional/forward/doc/html/index.html
>
>     What to include in Review Comments
>     ==================================
>
>     Your comments may be brief or lengthy, but basically the Review
>     Manager
>     needs your evaluation of the library. If you identify problems along
>     the way, please note if they are minor, serious, or showstoppers.
>
>     Here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:
>
>          * What is your evaluation of the design?
>          * What is your evaluation of the implementation?
>          * What is your evaluation of the documentation?
>          * What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the
>     library?
>          * Did you try to use the library? With what compiler?
>            Did you have any problems?
>          * How much effort did you put into your evaluation?
>            A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study?
>          * Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?
>
>     And finally, every review should answer this question:
>
>          * Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library?
>            Be sure to say this explicitly so that your other comments
>            don't obscure your overall opinion.
>
>     We're looking forward to your evaluation of this Boost candidate!
>
>     John Torjo
>     - Review Manager -
>
>
>
>     --
>     http://John.Torjo.com -- C++ expert
>     ... call me only if you want things done right
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Boost-users mailing list
>     Boost-users_at_[hidden] <mailto:Boost-users_at_[hidden]>
>     http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

-- 
http://John.Torjo.com -- C++ expert
... call me only if you want things done right