Re: [Boost-users] null_ptr?

From: Robert Dailey (rcdailey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-03 09:47:45

Well thanks guys for everything. I guess I don't need boost at all in this
case after all.

On Jan 2, 2008 8:25 PM, Miles Bader <miles_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> "Robert Dailey" <rcdailey_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > I can't really agree or disagree, as my information comes from an
> article I
> > read a long time ago. It stated that the portable way to assign NULL to
> a
> > pointer is to first cast it to the type of the lvalue.
> >
> > class foo {};
> > foo* myfoo = 0;
>
> No, that's guaranteed to work.  Either the article you read was wrong,
> or you misinterpreted it.
>
> -Miles
>
> --
> "Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that
>  you do it."  Mahatma Gandhi
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>