Re: [Boost-users] Port QT call to BOOST - Resolved

From: Frank Mori Hess (fmhess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-03 21:22:09

On Thursday 03 January 2008 12:43, j.c. wrote:
> So the consensus here is to not use BOOST signals? I could implement

Noone  said that.

> the calls another way that would not break when the application
> becomes multithreaded, which is likely to happen at some point. I
> would have to implement some sort of queue and lookup an id and then
> via a pointer trigger the target function along with parameter. Also I
> noticed that BOOST signals added a cool 300KB to my static lib,
> strippable to 200KB, which I am not too happy about since this lib's
> intentions was small size.

I would guess adding Qt would bloat your application even more, as Qt tends 
to be more "in for a penny, in for a pound" than boost libs.

-- 
Frank