Re: [Boost-users] thread_safe_signals API diffs?

From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-11 14:37:41

On Wednesday 02 January 2008 17:55 pm, Nat Goodspeed wrote:
> Thanks! Some of my colleagues are eager to switch to
> thread_safe_signals. If there are ways we should constrain our current
> use of the signals library to make that future conversion easier, I'd
> like to know them.

I've added an entry to the FAQ summarizing the changes from Boost.Signals 
1.34, see:

http://www.comedi.org/projects/thread_safe_signals/libs/thread_safe_signals/doc/html/index/s04.html

-- 
Frank