Re: [Boost-users] thread_safe_signals API diffs?

From: Nat Goodspeed (nat_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-02 17:55:43

Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday 02 January 2008 14:27 pm, Nat Goodspeed wrote:
>> I meant to ask: does the thread_safe_signals submission include a
>> summary of API differences from the 1.34 signals library? I remember
>> there was substantial e-mail discussion about that, but I can't remember
>> the outcome.
> 
> Hmm, no.  It does seem like it should have one though, I'll add a section to 
> the documentation for that.

Thanks! Some of my colleagues are eager to switch to 
thread_safe_signals. If there are ways we should constrain our current 
use of the signals library to make that future conversion easier, I'd 
like to know them.