Re: [Boost-users] [boost] [switch_] Compound Cases [was Case Concept]

From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-14 20:54:00

AMDG

Joel de Guzman wrote:
> Steven Watanabe wrote:
>
>   
>> Also, one thing that needs to be nailed down is: What Is I?
>> Tobias was using it as the index into the list of labels:
>>    mpl::int_<0>, mpl::int_<1>, mpl::int_<2>, ...
>> In my original interface and as you seem to be using it I is one of:
>>    mpl::at_c<labels, 0>::type, mpl::at_c<labels, 1>::type, 
>> mpl::at_c<labels, 2>::type
>>     
>
> It's in the concept I presented:
>
>      I  An MPL Integral Constant type
>
> Here:
>
>      http://boost.org/libs/mpl/doc/refmanual/integral-constant.html
>
> Anything special I am missing?
>   

What I meant was where they come from and thus how they should be 
interpreted.
If you have mpl::vector_c<int, 4,2, 7> do you get
mpl::int_<0>, mpl::int_<1>, and mpl::int_<2>
or
mpl::int_<4>, mpl::int_<2>, and mpl::int_<7>?

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe