Re: [Boost-users] isinf & Boost

From: Pete Bartlett (pete_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-27 14:06:02

John Maddock wrote:
> Pete Bartlett wrote:
> > I believe Johan's implementation is even more portable and robust than
> > John's, but perhaps less far through the review process:

> [..]I'd characterise it like this: 
[explanation snipped]

Thanks John for the helpful explanation. Apologies for the
mis-characterization of the differences between the two libraries and their
approaches.

Pete