|
Boost Users : |
From: Ovanes Markarian (om_boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-25 19:41:08
Robert,
IMO framework is a collaboration of classes which aim to focus in a concrete
functionality. Just think of Java Struts. This is a HUGE framework. It's
purpose is solely for server based programming in enterprise sector and
abstraction layer for web UI (more or less). Boost is a lib which consist of
a huge collection of particular libs. All these libs are not assigned to
function in some specific layer. They can be used as well in server based
programming as in UI. Try to use Struts to calculate some specific
mathematical formulas... You will probably fail, unless your own classes.
And I don't think struts will be ever adding this functionality, because
this is not the focus of it and probably will never be.
Hope that helped.
Ovanes
On 3/26/08, Robert Dailey <rcdailey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My head has been spinning lately on trying to nail down the difference
> between a library and a framework. One of my co-workers calls Boost a
> framework because it is a collaboration of components, and the fact that
> boost is so large makes it a framework. However, boost boasts itself as a
> library and I'm just wondering why it is such. One definition I read for a
> framework is that it has no requirement to be minimal, and boost is a fairly
> un-minimal library. Read the link below on an interesting conversation
> between the differences in a library and a framework:
>
> http://www.artima.com/forums/flat.jsp?forum=106&thread=152104
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net