|
Boost Users : |
From: Juergen Hunold (juergen.hunold_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-15 12:18:28
Hi Noah !
On Thursday 15 May 2008, Noah Roberts wrote:
> This doesn't make a lot of sense to me and seems like new behavior in
> .35:
>
> Running 1 test case...
> commands: commands.cpp:5: void test_construct(): Assertion `false'
> failed.
>
> *** No errors detected
> PASS: commands
> ==================
> All 1 tests passed
> ==================
>
>
> Previously, the use of BOOST_ASSERT(xxx) was the method of testing.
> Is that different now?
>
> Previously, I didn't return anything from the function, I just
> assert. Is that different now?
This bug was fixed in trunk in r45160.
See
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2008/04/136805.php
for the complete thread.
> Boost.Test isn't listed in the updated libraries for .35 but this is
> definitely not the behavior I was getting in .34
Yes, this was a regression :-((
Yours,
Jürgen
-- * Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold ! Ingenieurgesellschaft für * voice: ++49 511 262926 57 ! Verkehrs- und Eisenbahnwesen mbH * fax : ++49 511 262926 99 ! Lister Straße 15 * juergen.hunold_at_[hidden] ! www.ivembh.de * * Geschäftsführer: ! Sitz des Unternehmens: Hannover * Prof. Dr.-Ing. Thomas Siefer ! Amtsgericht Hannover, HRB 56965 * PD Dr.-Ing. Alfons Radtke !
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net