Boost logo

Boost Users :

From: Juergen Hunold (juergen.hunold_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-15 12:18:28


Hi Noah !

On Thursday 15 May 2008, Noah Roberts wrote:
> This doesn't make a lot of sense to me and seems like new behavior in
> .35:
>
> Running 1 test case...
> commands: commands.cpp:5: void test_construct(): Assertion `false'
> failed.
>
> *** No errors detected
> PASS: commands
> ==================
> All 1 tests passed
> ==================
>
>
> Previously, the use of BOOST_ASSERT(xxx) was the method of testing.
> Is that different now?
>
> Previously, I didn't return anything from the function, I just
> assert. Is that different now?

This bug was fixed in trunk in r45160.
See

http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2008/04/136805.php

for the complete thread.

> Boost.Test isn't listed in the updated libraries for .35 but this is
> definitely not the behavior I was getting in .34

Yes, this was a regression :-((

Yours,

Jürgen

-- 
* Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold       ! Ingenieurgesellschaft für 
* voice: ++49 511 262926 57       ! Verkehrs- und Eisenbahnwesen mbH  
* fax  : ++49 511 262926 99       ! Lister Straße 15
* juergen.hunold_at_[hidden]        ! www.ivembh.de
* 
* Geschäftsführer:                ! Sitz des Unternehmens: Hannover
* Prof. Dr.-Ing. Thomas Siefer    ! Amtsgericht Hannover, HRB 56965
* PD Dr.-Ing. Alfons Radtke       !

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net