|
Boost Users : |
From: Istvan Buki (buki.istvan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-03 16:47:30
ok, I understand now. Indeed, "variadic" was misleading.
Thanks for your help.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> AMDG
>
> Istvan Buki wrote:
> > thank you very much for your nice and clean solution.
> > May I ask you to post the variadic version as it is, even if it
> > doesn't compile. I'll try to find how to make it work. It will give me
> > a good starting point to learn more about these techniques.
>
> Just take the numbers off of the functions at_key1 and at_key2, so that
> they are overloaded.
> I suppose that variadic is not really the right term for this...
>
> In Christ,
> Steven Watanabe
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net