Boost logo

Boost Users :

From: Matthias Vallentin (vallentin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-09 08:50:09


On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 01:46:51PM +0200, Mojmir Svoboda wrote:
> there is a dark side of my approach: the user may not pay at the
> runtime, but certainly he'll suffer at compile-time. what you gain
> is control of the types passed to logging framework (how many times
> we all messed a printf's format and arguments? :)

<0.02>
I would not consider this a dark side. Enduring long compile cycles
seems tenable when optimizing for runtime-performance. Your design
sounds appealing to me. I am exactly looking for a small and efficient
logging library that provides basic functionality (levels, filters,
facilities, filters and alike) and has been designed from scratch to be
used in multi-threaded programs.
</0.02>

   Matthias

-- 
Matthias Vallentin
vallentin_at_[hidden]
pgp/gpg: 0x37F34C16

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net