|
Boost Users : |
From: Ronald Garcia (garcia_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-27 12:16:40
Hi Joey,
On Jun 26, 2008, at 2:43 PM, Joey Mukherjee wrote:
> Suppose this type of setup was within a function, is it possible to
> make OneDView the return value of this function? In other words, I
> would like to:
>
> array_type::const_array_view <1>::type OneDView;
> OneDView = multi_array[myindices];
> return OneDView;
>
Off-hand, I see no reason why you couldn't do this. So long as the
multi_array is still in existence, you can build and keep a view of
it. How are you calling your function? I'm afraid I can't tell what
the problem might be since I can't see how it's really used.
Cheers,
ron
>
> When I compile the code above, I get a compiler error saying
> operator= is private as least that's what I think it is saying!
>
> Joey
>
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net