Re: [Boost-users] When building should all the libraries have .dylib extensions on mac/unix?

From: console shark (consolejoker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-07 03:13:18

So it seems my problem is that my boost build is not making '.a' versions of all the libraries, only '.dylib' versions.

Out of the box it should be building both? Or do I have to configure it to do that?

----- Original Message ----
From: David Philp <david.philp_at_[hidden]>
To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
Sent: Sunday, July 6, 2008 10:14:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] When building should all the libraries have .dylib extensions on mac/unix?

On 07/07/2008, at 10:03 AM, console shark wrote:

> I just downloaded boost 1.35 and built the standard config. I have a  
> collection of files in the /lib output folder that all end  
> in .dylib. I am specifically interested in the python boost library,  
> which is there as well.
>
> However the project that I am using that requires this library is  
> expecting a file that ends with a .so extension.
>
> Being new to unix/mac I am assuming these are the equivalent  
> differences between a .dll and .lib file on Windows?

See
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Porting/Conceptual/PortingUnix/compiling/chapter_4_section_9.html

"dylib" is the usual Apple extension for a dynamically linked library,  
and "so" is the usual Linux / etc extension.  They are otherwise the  
same thing.  You should be able to use the .dylib file in place of  
the .so file.

> In any case how do I get the .so or static lib version of python  
> boost?

.a is the usual extension for statically linked libraries on Macs and  
Linux.  (a being "archive")  I have a libboost_python.a in the same  
place as libboost_python.dylib.

AIUI .a is similar to .lib, and .so / .dylib are similar to .dll: they  
have similar roles, but there are important differences.

D

_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users_at_[hidden]
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users