Re: [Boost-users] weak_ptr for intrusive_ptr

From: Alan M. Carroll (amc_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-17 23:05:53

At 09:18 AM 8/14/2008, you wrote:
>Alan M. Carroll:
>
>>I greatly prefer intrusive_ptr to shared_ptr, but one drawback of that is there is no equivalent of weak_ptr. I have started work on a class to do that and my biggest question, honestly, was what to name it.
>
>Will you make the code available for review? 

Yes. I have a lot of testing and Boostifcation to do before then.