Re: [Boost-users] weak_ptr for intrusive_ptr

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-20 09:33:03

Alan M. Carroll:

> At 09:18 AM 8/14/2008, you wrote:
>>Alan M. Carroll:
>>
>>>I greatly prefer intrusive_ptr to shared_ptr, but one drawback of that is 
>>>there is no equivalent of weak_ptr. I have started work on a class to do 
>>>that and my biggest question, honestly, was what to name it.
>>
>>Will you make the code available for review?
>
> Yes. I have a lot of testing and Boostifcation to do before then.

I didn't mean a formal Boost review... just a "can we take a look at it" 
review.